View Full Version : Homemade rear shock relocator bar...
john1974
October 27th, 2006, 12:02 PM
I am in the process of making one for my samurai, anyone have a suggestion on how thick of a bar I should use? I currently have on had 1/2 thick solid steel by 2 1/2 inches tall on hand...
zc911
October 27th, 2006, 12:30 PM
here is mine
http://www.zookpower.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=5821
i ahve a 1inch body lift thats why i was able to sit it on top of the frame, it;s 2.5x2.5 x 3/16th if memory serves me right. Had to pitch the gas tank too
SamiFlyer
October 27th, 2006, 01:30 PM
here is mine
http://www.zookpower.ca/forums/showthread.php?t=5821
i ahve a 1inch body lift thats why i was able to sit it on top of the frame, it;s 2.5x2.5 x 3/16th if memory serves me right. Had to pitch the gas tank too
That looks really nice Rob. I don't think it can get any cleaner or more functional than that.
Sean :cool:
john1974
October 27th, 2006, 01:30 PM
mine will be using stock upper mounts and then I will move shocks 4-6 inchs inward so they look like / \ Just wondering if the steel I have will be strong enough, I would think so its solid 1/2 thick.
frwinks
October 27th, 2006, 02:45 PM
its solid 1/2 thick.
I think you should be good to go dude:D
here's mine, slightly relocated
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v190/frwinks/SAMMI/version2/IMG_5212.jpg
longy442
October 27th, 2006, 05:48 PM
Heres a shot of mine before I put the body back on. It was easy for me to use the cross member in front of the gas tank as I moved rear axle back about six inchs.
longy442
October 27th, 2006, 05:52 PM
mine will be using stock upper mounts and then I will move shocks 4-6 inchs inward so they look like / \ Just wondering if the steel I have will be strong enough, I would think so its solid 1/2 thick.
SOLID 1/2" THICK!!???, How high to you intend to jump your truck??
It may end up being the thickest peice of metal on a zook. Ain't much else that thick. holly overkill.
john1974
October 27th, 2006, 09:57 PM
lol its what I had laying around, lil less than 1/2 in thick... :)
zc911
October 28th, 2006, 10:47 AM
That looks really nice Rob. I don't think it can get any cleaner or more functional than that.
Sean :cool:
thanks
After reading a trail tough article about shock placement, there was no way i was gonna put the shocks like this / \
longy442
October 28th, 2006, 11:22 AM
thanks
After reading a trail tough article about shock placement, there was no way i was gonna put the shocks like this / \
Why what did it say was wrong with that? I've seen alot done that way.
zc911
October 30th, 2006, 09:56 AM
here you go.
There are some very important elements to consider when selecting and mounting shocks. Shock placement affects much more than just up and down motion of the chassis in relation to the axle. For this reason, on spring over applications we do NOT suggest leaning the tops of the rear shocks toward the center of the chassis. Firstly, leaning the shocks into the center of the vehicle is completely unnecessary and will not improve travel. What it DOES do, however, is place your chassis upon a peak at its center (like a teeter-totter) therefore, no side-to-side body roll or cornering oscillation can be effectively dampened ie; the weeble-wobble effect on uneven road surfaces. Secondly, most off-the-shelf shocks are valved 30% compression and 70% extension. This is why they should not be mounted on the FRONT of the rear axle housing where axle wrap compresses them with very little resistance or dampening as opposed to being mounted on the REAR of the axle housing where axle wrap creates EXTENSION of the shock and dampens some axle wrap motion. We would suggest mounting the shocks on the rear on the original upper mounts and mounting the bottom of the shocks about 1" to 1 1/2" in from the inner u-bolts and at the bottom level of the axle tube with about 2" to 2 1/2" of up travel. Contrary to popular understanding, this in NO WAY limits wheel travel in this circumstance and here inlies the reason we choose to use the Doetsch Tech 8000 Prerunner shock - which come with built-in bump stops right on the shaft. How this works is when a wheel is driven up onto an obstacle (remember that the wheel travels much more than the shock) the shock bottoms out on the bump stop. However, the wheel continues upward - the axle simply cantilevers around the shock and bump stop - and forces the downside wheel down. Therefore, the weight of the body and chassis is transferred more evenly toward the downside wheel providing much more balance and even tire contact pressure. When shocks and placement are not tuned in this way, the downside wheel simply hangs of its own weight less the resistance of the bowed spring instead of actually FORCING the downside spring to be bowed and the tire to be pressed on the ground. These same forces apply to the front as well. The front generally has MORE wheel travel than the rear. Therefore, shock placement on the front will be a little different than the rear. The upper shock mounts should be as high as possible in the front wheel well. (We cut off the original upper mounts and use the Ford-type shock towers to achieve this). The lower front shock mounts should be on the top of the axle housing - about 1/2" in from the weld that attaches the knuckle ball to the axle tube. It also helps to have the shock eye approximately 1 1/2" toward the back of the axle tube. This configuration keeps the shock from colliding with the spring and ubolt plate when the axle is at full twist - as would take place if the shock was mounted below the axle housing. Again, the shock length should be tuned so that there is approximately 2" to 2 1/2" between the shock bump stop and shock body when the vehicle is sitting flat on its own weight. Tune your shocks correctly in this way and you will end up with shock travel left over at full droop. Better balance, better traction, and fewer broken axles!
SamiFlyer
October 30th, 2006, 10:15 AM
Hmmmm...
Some good good info there. :beer:
Sean :cool:
longy442
October 30th, 2006, 12:46 PM
here you go.
There are some very important elements to consider when selecting and mounting shocks. Shock placement affects much more than just up and down motion of the chassis in relation to the axle. For this reason, on spring over applications we do NOT suggest leaning the tops of the rear shocks toward the center of the chassis. Firstly, leaning the shocks into the center of the vehicle is completely unnecessary and will not improve travel. What it DOES do, however, is place your chassis upon a peak at its center (like a teeter-totter) therefore, no side-to-side body roll or cornering oscillation can be effectively dampened ie; the weeble-wobble effect on uneven road surfaces. Secondly, most off-the-shelf shocks are valved 30% compression and 70% extension. This is why they should not be mounted on the FRONT of the rear axle housing where axle wrap compresses them with very little resistance or dampening as opposed to being mounted on the REAR of the axle housing where axle wrap creates EXTENSION of the shock and dampens some axle wrap motion. We would suggest mounting the shocks on the rear on the original upper mounts and mounting the bottom of the shocks about 1" to 1 1/2" in from the inner u-bolts and at the bottom level of the axle tube with about 2" to 2 1/2" of up travel. Contrary to popular understanding, this in NO WAY limits wheel travel in this circumstance and here inlies the reason we choose to use the Doetsch Tech 8000 Prerunner shock - which come with built-in bump stops right on the shaft. How this works is when a wheel is driven up onto an obstacle (remember that the wheel travels much more than the shock) the shock bottoms out on the bump stop. However, the wheel continues upward - the axle simply cantilevers around the shock and bump stop - and forces the downside wheel down. Therefore, the weight of the body and chassis is transferred more evenly toward the downside wheel providing much more balance and even tire contact pressure. When shocks and placement are not tuned in this way, the downside wheel simply hangs of its own weight less the resistance of the bowed spring instead of actually FORCING the downside spring to be bowed and the tire to be pressed on the ground. These same forces apply to the front as well. The front generally has MORE wheel travel than the rear. Therefore, shock placement on the front will be a little different than the rear. The upper shock mounts should be as high as possible in the front wheel well. (We cut off the original upper mounts and use the Ford-type shock towers to achieve this). The lower front shock mounts should be on the top of the axle housing - about 1/2" in from the weld that attaches the knuckle ball to the axle tube. It also helps to have the shock eye approximately 1 1/2" toward the back of the axle tube. This configuration keeps the shock from colliding with the spring and ubolt plate when the axle is at full twist - as would take place if the shock was mounted below the axle housing. Again, the shock length should be tuned so that there is approximately 2" to 2 1/2" between the shock bump stop and shock body when the vehicle is sitting flat on its own weight. Tune your shocks correctly in this way and you will end up with shock travel left over at full droop. Better balance, better traction, and fewer broken axles!
:yike Sorry I asked, thats a long read:yike
Some good info. I think I see the shocks like / \ usually on link systems not too often on spoa. And on a 4 link turning the shocks at 45 degrees should double the travel if there are no other restrictions. (I think)
Fullload
October 31st, 2006, 08:01 PM
Hmmmm...
Some good good info there. :beer:
Sean :cool:
You actually read it? fawk that, my eyes started to bleed after the first three words.
I need things broken up and in paragraphs or i get lost and bored. I'll get the coles notes versions from you later.
Lol.
zc911
October 31st, 2006, 09:51 PM
hahah big babies lol
There are some very important elements to consider when selecting and mounting shocks. Shock placement affects much more than just up and down motion of the chassis in relation to the axle.
For this reason, on spring over applications we do NOT suggest leaning the tops of the rear shocks toward the center of the chassis.
Firstly, leaning the shocks into the center of the vehicle is completely unnecessary and will not improve travel.
What it DOES do, however, is place your chassis upon a peak at its center (like a teeter-totter) therefore, no side-to-side body roll or cornering oscillation can be effectively dampened ie; the weeble-wobble effect on uneven road surfaces.
Secondly, most off-the-shelf shocks are valved 30% compression and 70% extension. This is why they should not be mounted on the FRONT of the rear axle housing where axle wrap compresses them with very little resistance or dampening as opposed to being mounted on the REAR of the axle housing where axle wrap creates EXTENSION of the shock and dampens some axle wrap motion. We would suggest mounting the shocks on the rear on the original upper mounts and mounting the bottom of the shocks about 1" to 1 1/2" in from the inner u-bolts and at the bottom level of the axle tube with about 2" to 2 1/2" of up travel.
Contrary to popular understanding, this in NO WAY limits wheel travel in this circumstance and here inlies the reason we choose to use the Doetsch Tech 8000 Prerunner shock - which come with built-in bump stops right on the shaft. How this works is when a wheel is driven up onto an obstacle (remember that the wheel travels much more than the shock) the shock bottoms out on the bump stop.
However, the wheel continues upward - the axle simply cantilevers around the shock and bump stop - and forces the downside wheel down. Therefore, the weight of the body and chassis is transferred more evenly toward the downside wheel providing much more balance and even tire contact pressure. When shocks and placement are not tuned in this way, the downside wheel simply hangs of its own weight less the resistance of the bowed spring instead of actually FORCING the downside spring to be bowed and the tire to be pressed on the ground. These same forces apply to the front as well. The front generally has MORE wheel travel than the rear. Therefore, shock placement on the front will be a little different than the rear.
The upper shock mounts should be as high as possible in the front wheel well. (We cut off the original upper mounts and use the Ford-type shock towers to achieve this). The lower front shock mounts should be on the top of the axle housing - about 1/2" in from the weld that attaches the knuckle ball to the axle tube. It also helps to have the shock eye approximately 1 1/2" toward the back of the axle tube.
This configuration keeps the shock from colliding with the spring and ubolt plate when the axle is at full twist - as would take place if the shock was mounted below the axle housing. Again, the shock length should be tuned so that there is approximately 2" to 2 1/2" between the shock bump stop and shock body when the vehicle is sitting flat on its own weight. Tune your shocks correctly in this way and you will end up with shock travel left over at full droop.
Better balance, better traction, and fewer broken axles!
Fullload
October 31st, 2006, 10:40 PM
thank you. I read it all that time with only minimal redness to my eyes, but now i have a headache!!! :D
john1974
November 2nd, 2006, 11:19 AM
done, yes I know about side to side body roll, but I havent noticed anymore than when in stock position.
here it is although not complete.
http://www.zuknation.net/shock1.jpg
http://www.zuknation.net/shock2.jpg
http://www.zuknation.net/shock3.jpg
http://www.zuknation.net/shock4.jpg
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.4 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.